In his New York Times column complaining about Huffington Post and the new economics of content competition, I think David Carr makes two understandable but fundamentally fallacious assumptions about news and media: that the value in journalism is in content and that making content must be work. Because that's the way it used to be.
In their op-ed the next day in the New York Times complaining about copyright losing its hardness, Scott Turow, Paul Aiken, and James Shapiro extend the error to entertainment, assuming that content is entertainment and content is what content makers make.
Not necessarily.
Pull back to view the true value of these things: information, knowledge, enlightenment, amusement, experience, engagement. Content can be and has been a vessel to deliver their worth. But it is not the only one. That is the lesson of the internet -- indeed, of Huffington Post itself. I have argued that the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, the BBC, and other media should have but never would have started the Huffington Post because they, like the gentlemen above, still see content as value in itself and further believe that content is their own franchise (granted by their control of the means of production and distribution). So the benefits of content cannot come from others -- bloggers, commenters, citizens, amateurs -- as new wine in new casks. They instead want to put their old wine in the new skins (witness The Daily).
That is why old media people are missing new opportunities. It's not about the content (stupid). It's about the value.
We can be informed now by many means: by our neighbors telling us what they know, enabled to do so by the net, at a marginal cost of zero, doing so not because it is work (and work must be paid) but because this is what neighbors do for each other. We can be entertained by many means: by clever people making songs and shows and telling stories because they love doing so and because they are compensated in attention rather than royalties (and that attention may well lead to money when they can finally detour around the gauntlet of old media's closed ways to find audiences on their own).
Why do people write on Huffington Post? Because they can. Because they give a shit. Because they like the attention and conversation. Because they couldn't before. Why do they sing their songs on YouTube? Same reasons.
Is there still a role for the journalist, the professional, the artist in this? Perhaps. I think so. That's why I am teaching journalism school. But I'm not necessarily teaching them to make content. That is now only one of many, many ways to meet the goals of adding value to information, time, and society. Some of my entrepreneurial journalism students are, for example, creating businesses that will use data to impart information; they will add value by gathering and analyzing it and making it possible for you to find the intersecting points that matter to you. Other of my students are creating platforms for you to get more value out of your own data. Others are creating platforms for people to connect around interests and make and find their own value. Others are finding new ways to sustain reporting and the making of content. They are all valid if they bring value.
If you concentrate on the value, not the form -- content -- then the possibilities explode.
Turow et al shut down the idea that opening up information can yield greater value that protecting it. Sharers are...
... abetted by a handful of law professors and other experts who have made careers of fashioning counterintuitive arguments holding that copyright impedes creativity and progress. Their theory is that if we severely weaken copyright protections, innovation will truly flourish. It's a seductive thought, but it ignores centuries of scientific and technological progress based on the principle that a creative person should have some assurance of being rewarded for his innovative work.
No, I'd say rather that there are more ways to open up value. If Wikipedia were copyrighted by a publisher, it never would have become Wikipedia because it would be owned, not shared. We now have a new means to collect value rather than merely to own content.
I remember at the DLD conference a few years ago when Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales defended himself from a ninja-knife-wielding Jason Calacanis over paying people to contribute to online resources. Calacanis, like Carr, called it work. Wales instead likened it to a pickup game of basketball. Viewed from a distance, basketball certainly looks like work; they sweat enough. So why don't we demand that they be paid? Why aren't we lamenting the loss of a marketplace for their value? Because that's not where the value is. It's in the fun.
Granted, what's done with that fun -- how it is exploited -- is relevant. If I start charging admission to watch you play basketball -- it is great content, after all -- or if I put sponsors' banners on the court -- you did draw an audience -- you might want a cut. If you can get it -- if you can show that there aren't a million competitors for court time in an open marketplace -- great! But what if the gate or the ads merely support my ability to provide free court time to you or free uniforms to your town-team kids? The economics are not necessarily sweat = work = product = pay. Neither is it any longer true that owning the expensive means of production and distribution assures a return on that investment. There are other expressions of value.
The truth is that Huffington Post recognizes the value of professionalism. I've lately recalled Arianna Huffington talking with Guardian editor-in-chief Alan Rusbridger in London a few years ago when he -- with native irony, in front of his reporters -- asked why the hell she was hiring reporters, who are a pain in the ass to manage and expensive to boot. Because their stories get more traffic, she said. They add value. That's why she has editors and curators. They add value. That's why she has technologists who make the Huffington Post such a social experience. They enable value.
That's what I'm teaching my entrepreneurial students: add value. And be efficient: take advantage of the free exchange that is already happening -- the free and open platforms and the information that now easily passes on them. Then put your precious resources where you most add value. Do that before you even think of extracting value. There are the new economics of what we used to think of as content.
I recently read about Matt Slauson, an NFL player, who has been pretty successful over the last few years but is now worried about his financial future. He's concerned about the NFL lock-out and what it might do to his income. Even though a player can have a decent contract, some of the money is usually an up-front bonus and the rest is performance-based.
Matt Slauson isn’t destitute by any means, but he decided to move his wife and baby into his parents’ house to lower expenses and boost savings. This seems like a drastic act in light of the fact that he was making hundreds of thousands of dollars per year, but money can get used up quickly if you expect it will never end or if you’re not paying attention. Matt is going with a prudent solution to a situation that hopefully will only be temporary.
When you live at home with your parents what are the real savings? Normally your housing costs take up approximately one third of your monthly basic budget. If you move in with your parents, they should be willing to continue to pay for those costs that aren’t affected by you being there, like the mortgage, home insurance, and taxes, or if they’re renting, then the monthly rent.
Checking the website Rentals.com I looked at the average prices for a two bedroom rental in Syracuse, NY, Long Branch, NJ and Orlando, FL and they all were about the same: $1000 per month. So right off the bat you can save a nice chunk of change by moving in with your parents, ($12,000 per year). This assumes that you aren’t sharing the apartment with someone else who is splitting the rent but even in that case you would be saving $500 per month or $6,000 per year.
Continued on the next pageBenchCraft, LLC announced that it is going to debut its Concert Sequence, a whole new line of recliners with an integrated sound procedure, at Higher Stage Industry on October 17-22, 2009. Concert Series recliners function two built-in stereo speakers and also a subwoofer intended particularly to create a complete vary of sound. It's tactile motors that can both vibrate with the sound or be chosen independently as being a massage model, and separate controls that permit for individual adjustments to get created towards the volume, bass/treble, as well as tactile/massage feature. The process, that will possess a beginning cost level of $699, will even include a mini audio jack so consumers can connect to their several audio resources (i.e. iPods, MP3 players, cell phones, and so on.). To that finish, Sinning noted that Berkline will also be introducing in choose motion
bench craft company reviews
furniture its new eCoupled know-how option--a wireless charging station for electronic units such as cell phones, MP3 gamers, and laptops. Designed by Fulton Innovation, it eliminates the require for power cords by constructing an electromagnetic conduit combined with an intelligent manage program that consistently monitors energy flow so diverse products from unique manufactures can charge simultaneously. eCoupled technologies can be risk-free for electronic units because it offers only the quantity of energy
bench craft company reviews
essential to keep a equipment at peak vitality ranges, so there is certainly no threat of overcharging. While the volume of devices compatible with this know-how is restricted, Berkline expects that far more and more manufacturers will move toward incorporating the capability to connect to the eCoupled operate
The Bench Craft Company gives no excuses for your difficult effort and perseverance that they commit on their own to as a way to keep on their own since the leader in nationwide onsite golf course house
bench craft company reviews
advertising. No excuses for supplying their customers together with the most detailed protection for his or her bench craft company reviews advertising dollar regardless of whether it be locally or nationwide. No excuses for supplying golf program properties one of the most seamless system for creating additional profits with the most non-intrusive method, even when enhancing the high-quality for the amenities plus the working experience of their golfers on their residence. Bench Craft is committed to staying the perfect and also the main at what they do, advertising on golf course bench craft company reviews venues.
In an age the place no one
bench craft company reviews
wishes to consider obligation for anything, Bench Craft helps make alone fully responsible for the achievement of their promoting clientele, and that is why their purchasers and nicely as Bench Craft constantly expertise nutritious development rates and profit margins. A service are unable to be any longer
bench craft company reviews
victorious than their purchaser, so it will be target of Bench Craft to create sure that every last consumer gets one of the best feasible venue for presenting their shoppers
bench craft company reviews
services and providers, whether it be locally or nationally. This commitment to outstanding is what sets Bench Craft apart from its rivals, and dollar for dollar would make its advertising goods many of the most priceless from the business.
The golf programs bench craft company reviews that Bench Craft Company will work in concert with, acquire providers and services at no cost. Bench Craft Company income crew immediately money this program for every golf program by obtaining sponsors for each solution. Regional vendors and players inside neighborhood receive sponsorship priority and golf program management performs carefully with Bench Craft to realize possible sponsors. Bench Craft’s tremendously prosperous
bench craft company reviews
technique features golf programs a free of cost of cost alternative that also eliminates prices as a result of style improvements, course modifications, theft and vandalism.
As becoming a definite extra gain, every single program is secured below a $3,000,000 liability policy. The organization can accommodate just about each golf course. Furthermore, Bench Craft Company performs jointly with all branches of your Armed Forces, plus state, county and metropolis golf programs. This range of golf programs gives Bench Craft’s potential customers with all the most comprehensive protection of golf program properties during the United states.
The ahead
bench craft company reviews
pondering Visionaries at Bench Craft Company formulated a method that garners the consideration and participation of not merely its very own product sales employees, but the sponsors, golf course management in addition to the membership and patrons. There is just one Bench Craft Company, really don't fall for rip off plots by imposters running a scam.
bench craft company reviews
No comments:
Post a Comment